Neo-Roman Socialism

Assessing Liberty as Non-Domination in Hayek’s Political Philosophy

Authors

  • Dennis Graemer

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23941/ejpe.v17i2.861

Abstract

One of the most powerful arguments against socialism consists in the claim that it is incompatible with liberty. In the works of F.A. Hayek, this argument is developed in a sophisticated and systematic manner. Hayek’s attempt to prove the incompatibility of socialism and freedom relies on a concept of liberty that derives from the tradition of classical republicanism, and bears significant resemblance to the one used by current neo-republicans. To be free means not to be ruled in an arbitrary manner, not to be ruled by people, but by laws. Socialism however, Hayek claims, implies the direct and discretionary rule of bureaucrats over the whole economy, and thereby violates liberty.

The paper will examine this argument in detail, illuminate its connection to republicanism, and refute it. Such a refutation will not be directed against the concept of liberty employed by Hayek; instead, it will be shown that socialism properly implemented can conform to the demands of Hayek’s liberty.

Author Biography

Dennis Graemer

Dennis Graemer currently contemplates classical republicanism, Marxism, the epistemology of social change, and the aesthetics of the near future.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-30

How to Cite

Graemer, D. (2025). Neo-Roman Socialism: Assessing Liberty as Non-Domination in Hayek’s Political Philosophy. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 17(2), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.23941/ejpe.v17i2.861